Working with GPUs - Part1 - Using nvidia-smi

GPUs are the backbone of modern AI and HPC clusters, and understanding their basic health and configuration is the first step toward reliable operations. In this first post of the series, we start with nvidia-smi - the primary tool for discovering Nvidia GPUs, validating drivers and CUDA versions, and performing essential health checks. These fundamentals form the baseline for monitoring, performance benchmarking, and troubleshooting GPU compute nodes at scale.

Verify version 

nvidia-smi --version

List all GPUs 

nvidia-smi -L

Current state of every GPU

nvidia-smi

Following are the key observations from the above output:

• All 8 GPUs detected (NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3). Confirms full hardware enumeration. 
• HBM3 memory present (80GB per GPU). Validates expected SKU (H100 SXM vs PCIe). This is important because SXM GPUs behave differently in power, cooling, and NVLink bandwidth; troubleshooting playbooks differ by form factor.
• Driver version 550.90.07 with CUDA compatibility 12.4. This confirms a Hopper‑supported, production‑ready driver stack. Many issues (NCCL failures, DCGM errors, framework crashes) trace back to unsupported driver–CUDA combinations.
• Persistence Mode: On. This avoids GPU driver reinitialization delays and flaky behavior between jobs. Turning this off in clusters can cause intermittent job start failures or longer warm‑up times.
• Temperatures in 34–41 °C range at idle. This indicates healthy cooling and airflow. High idle temperatures point to heatsink issues, airflow obstructions, fan/BMC problems, or thermal paste degradation.
• Performance State: P0 (highest performance). This shows GPUs are not power or thermally‑throttled. If GPUs remain in lower P‑states under load, suspect thermal limits, power caps, or firmware misconfigurations.
• Power usage ~70–76 W with cap at 700 W. This confirms ample power headroom and no throttling. GPUs hitting the power cap during load may show reduced performance even when utilization appears high.
• GPU utilization at 0% and no running processes. This confirms the node is idle and clean. Useful to rule out “ghost” workloads, leaked CUDA contexts, or stuck processes when diagnosing performance drops.
• Memory usage ~1 MiB per GPU. Only driver bookkeeping allocations present. Any significant memory use at idle suggests leftover processes or failed container teardown.
• Volatile Uncorrected ECC errors: 0. Confirms memory integrity. Any non‑zero uncorrected ECC errors are serious and usually justify isolating the GPU and starting RMA/vendor diagnostics.
• MIG mode: Disabled. Ensures full GPU and NVLink bandwidth availability. MIG partitions can severely impact NCCL and large‑model training if enabled unintentionally.
• Compute mode: Default. Allows multiple processes (expected in shared clusters). Exclusive modes can cause unexpected job failures or scheduling issues.
• Fan: N/A (SXM platform). Normal for chassis‑controlled cooling. Fan values appearing unexpectedly may indicate incorrect sensor readings or platform misidentification.

Health metrics of all GPUs

nvidia-smi -q

This shows details like:

• Serial Number
• VBIOS Version
• GPU Part Number
• Utilization
• ECC Errors
• Temperature, etc.

Query GPU health metrics

Help: nvidia-smi --help-query-gpu

GPU memory usage and utilization: nvidia-smi --query-gpu=index,name,uuid,driver_version,memory.total,memory.used,utilization.gpu --format=csv

GPU temperature status: nvidia-smi --query-gpu=index,name,uuid,temperature.gpu,temperature.gpu.tlimit,temperature.memory --format=csv

GPU reset state: nvidia-smi --query-gpu=index,name,uuid,reset_status.reset_required,reset_status.drain_and_reset_recommended --format=csv

• reset_status.reset_required - indicates whether the GPU must be reset to return to a clean operational state.
• reset_status.drain_and_reset_recommended - Yes, indicates GPU/ node should be drained first, then reset. No, indicates reset can be done immediately.
• Note: In production GPU clusters based on Kubernetes, the safest and recommended practice is to always drain the node before attempting GPU recovery. For H100 SXM systems, recovery is performed via node reboot, not individual GPU resets.

NVLink topology

nvidia-smi topo -m

Note: Any non‑NVLink GPU‑to‑GPU path on H100 SXM immediately explains poor NCCL performance and requires hardware correction.

nvidia-smi nvlink -s         # shows per direction (Tx or Rx) bandwidth of all nvlinks of all GPUs

nvidia-smi nvlink -s -i 0 # shows per direction (Tx or Rx) bandwidth of all nvlinks of the GPU 0

Hope it was useful. Cheers!

Understanding NUMA: Its Impact on VM Performance in ESXi

VMware ESXi hosts use Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) architecture to optimize CPU and memory locality. Each NUMA node consists of a subset of CPUs and memory. Accessing local memory within the same NUMA node is significantly faster than remote memory access. Misaligned NUMA configurations can lead to latency spikes, increased CPU Ready Time, and degraded VM performance.

Key symptoms

The common symptoms for Virtual Machines (VMs) on ESXi that have a misconfigured or misaligned Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) configuration primarily manifest as performance degradation and latency. The main issue caused by NUMA misalignment is that the VM's vCPUs end up frequently having to access memory that belongs to a different physical NUMA node on the ESXi host (known as Remote Access), which is significantly slower than accessing local memory.

The resulting symptoms for the VM include:

• Overall Slowness and Unresponsiveness: Services and applications running inside the guest OS may respond slowly or intermittently. The entire VM can feel sluggish.

• High CPU Ready Time (%RDY): This is the most critical ESXi-level metric. CPU Ready Time represents the percentage of time a VM was ready to run but could not be scheduled on a physical CPU. High %RDY times (often above 5% or 10%) can indicate that the VM's vCPUs are struggling to get scheduled efficiently, which happens when they are spread across multiple NUMA nodes (NUMA spanning).

• Excessive Remote Memory Access: When a VM consumes more vCPUs or memory than is available on a single physical NUMA node, a portion of its memory traffic becomes "remote." You can check this using the esxtop utility on the ESXi host.

Common misconfigurations

Misalignment often occurs when the VM's vCPU and memory settings exceed the resources of a single physical NUMA node on the host. Common causes include:

• Over-Sized VM: Allocating more vCPUs than the physical cores available in a single physical NUMA node or allocating more memory than the physical memory on a single NUMA node.

• Hot-Add Features: Enabling CPU Hot-Add or Memory Hot-Add can disable vNUMA (Virtual NUMA) for the VM, preventing the VMkernel from presenting an optimized NUMA topology to the guest OS.

• Incorrect Cores per Socket Setting: While vSphere 6.5 and later are smarter about vNUMA, configuring the Cores per Socket value manually in a way that doesn't align with the host's physical NUMA topology can still lead to poor scheduling and memory placement, particularly when licensing dictates a low number of virtual sockets.

• Setting VM Limits: Setting a memory limit on a VM that is lower than its configured memory can force the VMkernel to allocate the remaining memory from a remote NUMA node.

Check NUMA assignments in ESXi

• SSH into the ESXi node.
• Issue the esxtop command and press m for memory view, then press f to enable the fields, G to enable NUMA information.

• You should be able to view the NUMA related information like NRMEM, NLMEM, and N%L.
• NRMEM (MB): NUMA Remote MEMory
• This is the current amount of a VM's memory (in MB) that is physically located on a remote NUMA node relative to where the VM's vCPUs are currently running.
• High NRMEM indicates NUMA locality issues, meaning the vCPUs must cross the high-speed interconnect (like Intel's QPI/UPI or AMD's Infinity Fabric) to access some of their data, which results in slower performance.
• NLMEM (MB): NUMA Local MEMory
• This is the current amount of a VM's memory (in MB) that is physically located on the local NUMA node, meaning it's on the same physical node as the vCPUs accessing it.
• The ESXi NUMA scheduler's goal is to maximize NLMEM to ensure fast memory access.
• N%L: NUMA % Locality
• This is the percentage of the VM's total memory that resides on the local NUMA node.
• A value close to 100% is ideal, indicating excellent memory locality. If this value drops below 80%, the VM may experience poor NUMA locality and potential performance issues due to slower remote memory access.
• Issue the esxtop command and press v to see the virtual machine screen.
• From the virtual machine screen note down the GID of the VM under consideration, and press q to exit the screen.
• Now issue the sched-stats -t numa-clients command. This will list down NUMA details of the VM. Check the groupID column to match the GID of the VM.
• For example, the GID of the VM I am looking at is 7886858. This is a 112 CPU VM which is running on an 8-socket physical host.

• You can see the VM is spread/ placed under NUMA nodes 0, 1, 2, and 3.
• The remoteMem is 0, for each of these NUMA nodes, which means they are accessing all the local memory of the NUMA node.
• To view physical NUMA details of the ESXI you can use sched-stats -t numa-pnode command. You can see this server has 8 NUMA nodes.

• To view the NUMA latency, you can use the sched-stats -t numa-latency command.

Verify NUMA node details at guest OS

Windows

• Easiest way is to go to Task Manager - Performance - CPU
• Right click on the CPU utilization graph and select Change graph to - NUMA nodes
• If there only one NUMA node, you may notice the option as greyed out.
• To get detailed info you can consider using the sysinternals utility coreinfo64.

Linux

• To view NUMA related details from the Linux guest OS layer, you can use the following commands:

lscpu | grep -i NUMA

dmesg | grep -i NUMA

Remediation

The most common remediation steps for fixing Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) related performance issues in ESXi VMs revolve around right-sizing the VM to align its resources with the physical NUMA boundaries of the host.

The primary goal is to minimize Remote Memory Access (NRMEM) and maximize Local Memory Access (N%L). The vast majority of NUMA issues stem from a VM's resource allocation crossing a physical NUMA node boundary.

• Right-Size VMs: Keep vCPU count within physical cores of a single NUMA node.
• Evenly Divide Resources: For monster/ wide VMs, ensure the total vCPUs are configured such that they are evenly divisible by the number of physical NUMA nodes they span.
• Example: If a VM needs 16 vCPUs on a host with 12-core NUMA nodes, configure the vCPUs to be a multiple of a NUMA node count (e.g., 2 sockets $\times$ 8 cores per socket to create 2 vNUMA nodes, aligning with 2 pNUMA nodes).
• Cores per Socket Setting (Important for older vSphere/Licensing): While vSphere 6.5 and later automatically present an optimal vNUMA topology, you should still configure the Cores per Socket setting on the VM to create a vNUMA structure that aligns with the physical NUMA boundaries of the host. This helps the guest OS make better scheduling decisions.
• Disable VM CPU/ Memory Hot-Add: Plan capacity upfront.

NUMA awareness is critical for troubleshooting and optimizing VM performance on ESXi. Misconfigured NUMA placements can severely impact latency-sensitive workloads like databases and analytics. Regular checks at both the hypervisor and guest OS layers ensure memory locality, reduce latency, and improve efficiency.

References

• 64 Cores per NUMA Node Limit in Microsoft SQL Server: Recommendation for Efficiently Allocating Logical CPUs to SQL Server VMs on VMware vSphere - VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Blog 
• Architecting Microsoft SQL Server on VMware vSphere | VMware 
• Virtual Machine vCPU and vNUMA Rightsizing - Guidelines - VROOM! Performance Blog 
• Setting corespersocket can affect guest OS topologies 
• Performance Best Practices for VMware vSphere 7.0, Update 3 
• Home - Flings (broadcom.com)  (Virtual Machine Compute Optimizer)
• vSphere 7 Cores per Socket and Virtual NUMA - frankdenneman.nl 
• How many NUMA Nodes do I have? – SQLpassion 
• Coreinfo - Sysinternals | Microsoft Learn

Hope it was useful. Cheers!

Revisiting Storage Performance Benchmarking

Few years ago, I had the opportunity to explore the intricacies of storage performance benchmarking using tools like FIO, DISKSPD, and Iometer. Those studies provided valuable insights into the performance characteristics of various storage solutions, shaping my understanding and approach to storage performance analysis. As I prepare for an upcoming project in this domain, I find it essential to revisit my previous work, reflect on the lessons learned, and share my experiences. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of my benchmarking journey and the evolving landscape of storage performance studies.

Recent advancements 

The field of storage technology has seen significant advancements in recent years. The rise of NVMe and storage-class memory technologies has also redefined high-end storage performance, offering unprecedented speed and efficiency. These advancements highlight the dynamic nature of storage performance benchmarking and underscore the importance of staying updated with the latest tools and methodologies.

Challenges

Benchmarking storage performance is not without its challenges. One of the primary difficulties is ensuring a consistent and controlled testing environment, as variations in hardware, software, and network conditions can significantly impact results. Another challenge is the selection of appropriate benchmarks that accurately reflect real-world workloads, which requires a deep understanding of the specific use cases and performance metrics. Additionally, interpreting the results can be complex, as it involves analyzing multiple metrics such as IOPS, throughput, and latency, and understanding their interplay. These challenges necessitate meticulous planning and a thorough understanding of both the benchmarking tools and the storage systems being tested.

Prior works

Following are some of the articles on storage benchmarking that I’ve published in the past:

• Benchmarking vSphere environment using HCIBench
• vSAN performance benchmarking considerations
• Stress test your storage system using Iometer
• Storage performance benchmarking of Kubernetes using FIO StatefulSet
• Benchmarking Kubernetes using K-Bench

Custom storage benchmarking framework

While there are numerous storage benchmarking tools available, such as VMFleet and HCIBench, I wanted to highlight a custom framework I developed a few years ago. Here are some reasons why we created this custom tool:

• Great learning experience: It provided valuable insights into how things work.
• Customization: Being a custom framework, it allows you to add or remove features as needed.
• Flexibility: You can modify multiple parameters to suit your requirements.
• Custom test profiles: You can create tailored storage test profiles.
• No IP assignment needed: There’s no need for IP assignment or DHCP for the stress test VMs.
• Centralized log collection: It offers centralized log collection for detailed analysis.

You can access the scripts and readme on my GitHub repository:

https://github.com/vineethac/vsan_cluster_storage_benchmarking_with_diskspd

Here is an overview.

• Profile Manifest: All storage test profiles are listed in profile_manifest.psd1. You can define as many profiles as you want.

• VM Template: A Windows VM template should be present in the vCenter server.

• Benchmarking Manifest: Details of vCenter, cluster name, VM template, number of stress test VMs per host, etc., are provided in benchmarking_manifest.psd1.

• Deploy Test VMs: deploy_test_vms.ps1 will deploy all the test VMs with pre-configured parameters.

• Start Stress Test: start_stress_test.ps1 will initiate the storage stress test process for all the profiles mentioned in profile_manifest.psd1 one by one.

• Log Collection: All log files will be automatically copied to a central location on the host from where these scripts are running.

• Cleanup: Use delete_test_vms.ps1 to clean up the stress test VMs from the cluster.

Note: These scripts were created about five years ago, and I haven’t had the opportunity to refactor them according to current best practices and new PowerShell scripting standards. I plan to enhance them in the coming months!

This overview should provide you with a clear understanding of the overall process and workflow involved in the storage benchmarking process. I hope it was useful. Cheers!

vSphere with Tanzu using NSX-T - Part14 - Testing TKC storage using kubestr

In the previous posts we discussed the following:

Part1 - Prerequisites

Part2 - Configure NSX

Part3 - Edge Cluster

Part4 - Tier-0 Gateway and BGP peering

Part5 - Tier-1 Gateway and Segments

Part6 - Create tags, storage policy, and content library

Part7 - Enable workload management

Part8 - Create namespace and deploy Tanzu Kubernetes Cluster

Part9 - Monitoring

Part10 - Upgrade Tanzu Kubernetes Cluster

Part11 - Troubleshooting TKC

Part12 - Deploy application on TKC and access it

Part13 - Export WCP admin kubeconfig

This article is about using kubestr to test storage options of Tanzu Kubernetes Cluster (TKC). Following are the steps to install kubestr on MAC:

• wget https://github.com/kastenhq/kubestr/releases/download/v0.4.31/kubestr_0.4.31_MacOS_amd64.tar.gz
• tar -xvf kubestr_0.4.31_MacOS_amd64.tar.gz 
  
• chmod +x kubestr
• mv kubestr /usr/local/bin

 

Now, lets do kubestr help.

% kubestr help
kubestr is a tool that will scan your k8s cluster
        and validate that the storage systems in place as well as run
        performance tests.

Usage:
  kubestr [flags]
  kubestr [command]

Available Commands:
  browse      Browse the contents of a CSI PVC via file browser
  csicheck    Runs the CSI snapshot restore check
  fio         Runs an fio test
  help        Help about any command

Flags:
  -h, --help             help for kubestr
  -e, --outfile string   The file where test results will be written
  -o, --output string    Options(json)

Use "kubestr [command] --help" for more information about a command.

 

I am going to use the following TKC for testing.

% KUBECONFIG=gc.kubeconfig kubectl get nodes                                            
NAME                               STATUS   ROLES                  AGE    VERSION
gc-control-plane-pwngg             Ready    control-plane,master   103d   v1.20.9+vmware.1
gc-workers-wrknn-f675446b6-cz766   Ready    <none>                 103d   v1.20.9+vmware.1
gc-workers-wrknn-f675446b6-f6zqs   Ready    <none>                 103d   v1.20.9+vmware.1
gc-workers-wrknn-f675446b6-rsf6n   Ready    <none>                 103d   v1.20.9+vmware.1

 

Let's run kubestr against the cluster now.

% KUBECONFIG=gc.kubeconfig kubestr                                      

**************************************
  _  ___   _ ___ ___ ___ _____ ___
  | |/ / | | | _ ) __/ __|_   _| _ \
  | ' <| |_| | _ \ _|\__ \ | | |   /
  |_|\_\\___/|___/___|___/ |_| |_|_\

Explore your Kubernetes storage options
**************************************
Kubernetes Version Check:
  Valid kubernetes version (v1.20.9+vmware.1)  -  OK

RBAC Check:
  Kubernetes RBAC is enabled  -  OK

Aggregated Layer Check:
  The Kubernetes Aggregated Layer is enabled  -  OK

W0130 14:17:16.937556   87541 warnings.go:70] storage.k8s.io/v1beta1 CSIDriver is deprecated in v1.19+, unavailable in v1.22+; use storage.k8s.io/v1 CSIDriver
Available Storage Provisioners:

  csi.vsphere.xxxx.com:
    Can't find the CSI snapshot group api version.
    This is a CSI driver!
    (The following info may not be up to date. Please check with the provider for more information.)
    Provider:            vSphere
    Website:             https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/vsphere-csi-driver
    Description:         A Container Storage Interface (CSI) Driver for VMware vSphere
    Additional Features: Raw Block,<br/><br/>Expansion (Block Volume),<br/><br/>Topology Aware (Block Volume)

    Storage Classes:
      * sc2-01-vc16c01-wcp-mgmt

    To perform a FIO test, run-
      ./kubestr fio -s <storage class>
 

 

You can run storage tests using kubestr and it uses FIO for generating IOs. For example this is how you can run a basic storage test.

% KUBECONFIG=gc.kubeconfig kubestr fio -s sc2-01-vc16c01-wcp-mgmt -z 10G
PVC created kubestr-fio-pvc-zvdhr
Pod created kubestr-fio-pod-kdbs5
Running FIO test (default-fio) on StorageClass (sc2-01-vc16c01-wcp-mgmt) with a PVC of Size (10G)
Elapsed time- 29.290421119s
FIO test results:
 
FIO version - fio-3.20
Global options - ioengine=libaio verify=0 direct=1 gtod_reduce=1

JobName: read_iops
  blocksize=4K filesize=2G iodepth=64 rw=randread
read:
  IOPS=3987.150391 BW(KiB/s)=15965
  iops: min=3680 max=4274 avg=3992.034424
  bw(KiB/s): min=14720 max=17096 avg=15968.827148

JobName: write_iops
  blocksize=4K filesize=2G iodepth=64 rw=randwrite
write:
  IOPS=3562.628906 BW(KiB/s)=14267
  iops: min=3237 max=3750 avg=3565.896484
  bw(KiB/s): min=12950 max=15000 avg=14264.862305

JobName: read_bw
  blocksize=128K filesize=2G iodepth=64 rw=randread
read:
  IOPS=2988.549316 BW(KiB/s)=383071
  iops: min=2756 max=3252 avg=2992.344727
  bw(KiB/s): min=352830 max=416256 avg=383056.187500

JobName: write_bw
  blocksize=128k filesize=2G iodepth=64 rw=randwrite
write:
  IOPS=2754.796143 BW(KiB/s)=353151
  iops: min=2480 max=2992 avg=2759.586182
  bw(KiB/s): min=317440 max=382976 avg=353242.781250

Disk stats (read/write):
  sdd: ios=117160/105647 merge=0/1210 ticks=2100090/2039676 in_queue=4139076, util=99.608589%
  -  OK

As you can see, a PVC of 10G, a FIO pod will be created, and this will be used for the FIO test. Once the test is complete, the PVC and FIO pod will be deleted automatically. 

I hope it was useful. Cheers!

Benchmarking Kubernetes infrastructure using K-Bench

K-Bench is a framework to benchmark the control and data plane aspects of a Kubernetes cluster. More details are available at https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/k-bench. In my case, I am going to conduct this benchmarking study on a Tanzu Kubernetes cluster which is provisioned using Tanzu Kubernetes Grid service on a vSphere 7 U1 cluster.

Step 1: Clone the K-Bench repo

git clone https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/k-bench.git

Step 2: Install

./install.sh

Once the installation is done it will say, "Completed k-bench installation.".

Step 3: Run the benchmark

./run.sh

If you don't specify any test, then it is going to conduct the default set of tests. All sets of tests are defined under the config directory. If you browse to the config directory and list, there are separate folders specific to each test. You can see folders starting with cp and dp, and it refers to control plane and data plane related tests.

If no specific test is mentioned, then it is going to run all that is defined in the default directory. You can also see details of the test and results in the logs. The directories starting with "results" will have log files corresponding to each test run.

Following is a sample log that shows a summary of pod creation throughput, pod creation average latency, pod startup total latency, list/ update/ delete pod latency, etc.

Now, if you want to run a specific test case, you can do it as follows:

Usage: ./run.sh -r <run-tag> [-t <comma-separated-tests> -o <output-dir>]

DP network internode test

For example, you can run a data plane test to check the network performance between two nodes as shown below.

./run.sh -r "kbench-run-on-tkg-cluster-02"  -t "dp_network_internode" -o "./"

As soon as you run the above command, two pods will be created inside "kbench-pod-namespace" on two worker nodes as you see below.

It will then start "iperf3" process inside those two pods to create a network load following a client-server model as per the actions defined in the config.json file.

Sample logs are given below. It shows details like the amount of data transferred, transfer rate, network latency, etc.

Once the test run is complete, the pods and other resources created will be automatically deleted. Similarly, you can select the other set of tests that are pre-defined in the framework. I believe you have the flexibility to define custom test cases too as per your requirements. I hope it was useful. Cheers!

Related posts

Storage performance benchmarking of Tanzu Kubernetes clusters
Monitoring Tanzu Kubernetes cluster using Prometheus and Grafana

References

Storage performance benchmarking of Tanzu Kubernetes Clusters

Benchmarking of IT infrastructure is standard practice and is usually done before putting it into a production environment. It gives you baseline values about different performance aspects of the system/ solution under test. These benchmarking principles are applicable for Kubernetes clusters too. But the test cases and evaluation criteria may slightly vary compared to benchmarking a traditional IT infrastructure. 

Following are some of the test considerations:

• Performance of PVCs.
• Time to provision PVCs.
• Read/ Write IOPS and Latency of PVCs.
• Pod startup latency.
• The time consumed to complete the deployment of different K8s objects.
• Statefulset
• Deployment etc.
• Performance behavior of sample application workloads.
• Network performance and connectivity between different K8s nodes.

In this article, I will explain a quick and easy way to benchmark the storage system used by the Kubernetes cluster to provision PVCs for application workloads. I am using FIO to generate storage IOs. You can use the following YAML file to deploy FIO pods as a statefulset. Note that here I am using PowerFlex VVOL datastore as Cloud Native Storage (CNS) for Tanzu K8s clusters and so the storage class "powerflex-storage-policy". This may differ in your case, and you might need to modify it to match the storage class available in your setup.

This YAML file will deploy a statefulset with 15 FIO pods (as per the number of replicas mentioned) and will start the storage IO stress test (8k block size, 70% random reads, 30% random writes, 2 jobs, 16 iodepth) on the attached PVC as and when the pod is started. Total 15 PVCs will be created in this case, and one PVC will get attached to one FIO pod. 

Note: If you get an error "forbidden: unable to validate against any pod security policy" after applying the above statefulset, then the pods will not get created. You will need to first create and apply Pod Security Policy (PSP) to the Tanzu Kubernetes Cluster.

Following is an overview of my vSphere with Tanzu setup:

Tanzu K8s control plane nodes/ master VMs: 3

Tanzu K8s worker nodes/ VMs: 15

Contexts, Tanzu K8s cluster nodes, and storage class.

Create a statefulset using the above YAML file.

kubectl apply -f https://gist.githubusercontent.com/vineethac/7c9f6ce2b72868b8832a4404b79ebba2/raw/980f9d6c24c10b1b7b39b20d80c15a9f2ee6c4f1/fio_ss.yaml -n <namespace name>

You can see that it took roughly 6 minutes to deploy 15 FIO pods and corresponding PVCs. The time may vary depending on whether the FIO image is locally available on the nodes, available resources on the nodes, etc.  

As and when each pod is created, FIO will automatically start IO stress on it. IOs will be read/ written into the attached PVCs. As I mentioned earlier, I am using a storage class "powerflex-storage-policy" and this is associated with a VVOL datastore backed by a PowerFlex storage pool. In this case, all the PVCs are created in a PowerFlex VVOL datastore.

You can also see multiple volumes in the PowerFlex UI and all those volume names starting with "vasa" are externally managed by the PowerFlex VASA provider. The performance of each volume can be also be monitored using the PowerFlex UI.

If you would like to see the historical performance data, you can use vROps. Dell EMC has recently released a vROps management pack for PowerFlex systems. It is a monitoring and alerting solution that provides extensive visibility into the PowerFlex infrastructure. For monitoring K8s clusters and resources, you can use the vROps management pack for container monitoring. 

Note: When the duration mentioned in the FIO test is over, the pods will get restarted and the IO stress will also start. To modify the FIO parameters you can use kubectl edit statefulset fiopod-statefulset-multipod -n fiogit modify required parameters and save it. After saving it the new changes will get applied automatically. Once you are done with the testing, you can delete the statefulset and the corresponding PVCs using kubectl delete command. This method is useful when you want to test something quickly or if you have only less test profiles. If you have many test profiles with varying block sizes, iodepth, etc, then you will need to build a small script or something to automate the process. 

Hope it was useful. Cheers!

Related articles

Monitoring Tanzu Kubernetes cluster using Prometheus and Grafana
Visualize your Kubernetes clusters and workloads using Octant
Tanzu Kubernetes Grid (TKG) on vSphere 6.7 U3 - Part3 - Deploy FIO pod with persistent storage
vSAN performance benchmarking

References

https://volumes.blog/2020/07/09/dell-technologies-powerflex-integration-with-vmware-tanzu-kubernetes-grid-tkg/

https://thenewstack.io/k-bench-a-benchmark-to-measure-kubernetes-control-and-data-plane-performance/

https://rguske.github.io/post/vsphere-7-with-kubernetes-supercharged-helm-harbor-tkg/